Shannon Pruitt - Week 2 Responses
- How might the cultural background or socioeconomic status of families impact their ability to implement the suggested strategies for promoting emergent literacy in toddlers with visual impairments?
The suggested strategies for promoting emergent literacy in toddlers with visual impairments recommend that the family of the student create a literacy-rich environment. This environment should incorporate language development strategies through child-directed speech used during natural routines and the interactive reading of books (and experiences), where the adult helps the child experience and expand on what is said or read. However, a family’s cultural background can impact their ability to implement the use of child-directed speech and interactive reading of books or experiences, as different cultures place varying values on reading, speaking, storytelling, and educational practices in general. Though these strategies are promising for students with visual impairments, cultural norms and the family’s lack of experience with people with visual impairments may make these strategies seem meaningless or unnatural. Additionally, if the family’s first language is not English and the student is in an English-speaking country, it will be more difficult for the family to implement these strategies in English. Even if the parents try implementing the strategies in their native language, there are sometimes barriers because family members may not be literate in their native language. Furthermore, socioeconomic barriers can reduce the family’s ability to obtain the needed materials and books for the student to gain the experiences and interactions with books and language that might be more accessible when money is not a concern.
- Reflecting on your own experiences as a student, how did teacher expectations influence your academic performance and motivation? How might you apply these insights to your own teaching practice?
Teacher expectations completely changed how I viewed my own abilities and impacted my decision to become a teacher myself. All through elementary and middle school, I was an average student in most aspects of academia. I was part of a class that included many students with high aptitudes and intelligence. So, while school was not necessarily hard for me, I didn’t view my own abilities as particularly strong. However, once I got to high school, I had a math teacher who pointed out to me that I actually had a relative strength in math. This was the first time I had considered myself exceptional in any subject. Because the teacher showed particular interest in my abilities and held me accountable when they thought I wasn’t doing my best, I continued to excel in math—eventually even deciding to become a math teacher (before a TVI, of course). 
- Prior to viewing the module video, what were your assumptions about Dyslexia? How did the simulation activity change or contribute to your understanding of Dyslexia?
I’m not sure I had any assumptions about dyslexia that were changed. In my experience in the state of North Carolina, dyslexia is considered to be a diagnosis, and thus, students are usually diagnosed first with dyslexia and then they may or may not be found eligible for special education under the category of a specific learning disability. All of the training I have received has focused on determining if a student has a specific learning disability and not dyslexia since dyslexia cannot be diagnosed by a teacher.
I think that I most benefited from the explanation of the different behaviors you may see in students at different ages. Particularly, it was interesting to know that early readers may have difficulty with rhyming.
- Reflect on the seven specific suggestions provided for teachers of reading classes with ELLs. How practical and feasible are these suggestions in real classroom contexts?
I do think that these recommendations are both practical and feasible in real classroom contexts. However, I say that with one caveat: there must be commitment, buy-in, accountability from staff, and a willingness of staff to purposely work together. If these things are not in place, I do not believe it is feasible for one teacher to take this on by themselves. I say this because, in my own experience, I have unknowingly implemented these suggestions with my ELL students who are learning braille. However, I am typically working with these students one-on-one—not in addition to an entire class of other students with their own needs. That being said, I think a classroom teacher has to ensure they are planning for ELL students’ needs within the context of each lesson plan. This requires that the ELL teacher and the classroom teacher work together to understand easy ways of implementing these strategies. I also think some of the load on the classroom teacher can be alleviated by collaborating on lessons with the student’s ELL teacher so that there is a plan for what will be done in the classroom and what will be reinforced and practiced in the ESL class. Unfortunately, in my experience, I have not seen this type of collaboration and planning regularly. 